The goal of this step is to monitor the project results and to assure them in the long term, as well as to take appropriate measures to ensure a continuous improvement of the process. Also, the process is given over to the process owners, and the project is concluded.
Both, technical processes and service processes, must be supervised and controlled. Before installing supervisory systems, a decision must be taken about the indicators that are to be included. These indicators can basically be classified into two categories.
The first category is made up of the so-called lagging indicators, which show a result or a trend at the end of a process. Finance indicators usually have a delayed action, since the process was already executed, when the finances can be observed. This type of indicators can be used only in the long term, but not in the short term, for process control.
The second category consists of the so-called leading indicators, which provide data during the execution of the process about the result to be expected, before concluding the process. Thus, such indicators are much better to be used for a short-term process control.
Often, the project result variables Y can be classified as lagging indicators, while the causes X are usually leading indicators. Therefore, when selecting the indicators to be used for the process supervision, you should start by reviewing the error causes X. Obviously it is convenient to also include the result variables Y. A process supervision system consists of the following elements:
Apart from the process management plan, which serves mainly for the short-term process regulation and only allows snapshots of the process status, it is necessary to set up a control system that is effective in the long term. The basis for this control system allows a representation of important process indicators as a function of time. With it, using simple rules, patterns in the process variables can be seen, which point to systematic changes such as shifts, trends, or outliers.